<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Million Dollar Baby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baboonlogic.com/2007/04/27/the-million-dollar-baby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baboonlogic.com/2007/04/27/the-million-dollar-baby/</link>
	<description>Baboon Logic - It&#039;s Godel proof!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:32:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Incorrigible Introvert</title>
		<link>http://baboonlogic.com/2007/04/27/the-million-dollar-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-4928</link>
		<dc:creator>Incorrigible Introvert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baboonlogic.com/2007/04/27/the-million-dollar-baby/#comment-4928</guid>
		<description>The &lt;i&gt;females under 18&lt;/i&gt; have rated it at 6.0, while I in my better/bitter moods would not give it anything more than 5.0.

Besides, this pole is hardly credible. 80% of the voters have rated it more than 8, and 63% rated it more than 9 (45% rated more than 10!). Extreme measures of filters/weights must have been applied to get a sensible result. While it could make sense in a much bigger sample space, it means nothing in the sample space of 278 females under 18, most of whom actually seem to like the movie.

The &lt;i&gt;top 1000&lt;/i&gt; voters thing makes more sense, with about 18% of the voters rating the movie at 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <i>females under 18</i> have rated it at 6.0, while I in my better/bitter moods would not give it anything more than 5.0.</p>
<p>Besides, this pole is hardly credible. 80% of the voters have rated it more than 8, and 63% rated it more than 9 (45% rated more than 10!). Extreme measures of filters/weights must have been applied to get a sensible result. While it could make sense in a much bigger sample space, it means nothing in the sample space of 278 females under 18, most of whom actually seem to like the movie.</p>
<p>The <i>top 1000</i> voters thing makes more sense, with about 18% of the voters rating the movie at 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anshul</title>
		<link>http://baboonlogic.com/2007/04/27/the-million-dollar-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-4929</link>
		<dc:creator>anshul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baboonlogic.com/2007/04/27/the-million-dollar-baby/#comment-4929</guid>
		<description>So, your taste matches the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0352248/ratings-female_age_1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;females under 18&lt;/a&gt; demographic. :P

Well, jokes apart,  it also matches the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0352248/ratings-top_1000&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;top 1000 voters&lt;/a&gt; demographic, which I think is something you could do well to check when you are feeling extremely moody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, your taste matches the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0352248/ratings-female_age_1" rel="nofollow">females under 18</a> demographic. :P</p>
<p>Well, jokes apart,  it also matches the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0352248/ratings-top_1000" rel="nofollow">top 1000 voters</a> demographic, which I think is something you could do well to check when you are feeling extremely moody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
