<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History as we rewrite it &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baboonlogic.com/2007/07/13/history-as-we-rewrite-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baboonlogic.com/2007/07/13/history-as-we-rewrite-it/</link>
	<description>Baboon Logic - It&#039;s Godel proof!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 16:10:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Incorrigible Introvert</title>
		<link>http://baboonlogic.com/2007/07/13/history-as-we-rewrite-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4984</link>
		<dc:creator>Incorrigible Introvert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baboonlogic.com/2007/07/13/history-as-we-rewrite-it/#comment-4984</guid>
		<description>Yes, History is not a strict science like Physics, and that is why I kept the comparison limited to the process of coming up with new theories, which can take a lot of creativity and individuality.

I made the comparison with Physics, because both History and Physics are about the reconstruction of reality from the given data. In physics we have a working Universe and we have to guess the rules, in History we have a &lt;em&gt;working&lt;/em&gt; past and we have to guess how it happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, History is not a strict science like Physics, and that is why I kept the comparison limited to the process of coming up with new theories, which can take a lot of creativity and individuality.</p>
<p>I made the comparison with Physics, because both History and Physics are about the reconstruction of reality from the given data. In physics we have a working Universe and we have to guess the rules, in History we have a <em>working</em> past and we have to guess how it happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sucharit Sarkar</title>
		<link>http://baboonlogic.com/2007/07/13/history-as-we-rewrite-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4983</link>
		<dc:creator>Sucharit Sarkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baboonlogic.com/2007/07/13/history-as-we-rewrite-it/#comment-4983</guid>
		<description>History is not a strict science like Physics, because it is not falsifiable in the strict sense of the term. Given a theory in History, you cannot in general construct an infinite family of experiments, such that if any one of them fail, the theory is wrong.

P.S. String theory isn&#039;t much of a theory either, and for precisely the same reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History is not a strict science like Physics, because it is not falsifiable in the strict sense of the term. Given a theory in History, you cannot in general construct an infinite family of experiments, such that if any one of them fail, the theory is wrong.</p>
<p>P.S. String theory isn&#8217;t much of a theory either, and for precisely the same reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

